Depth That Static Forms Cannot Reach
A form asking "What are your goals?" gets "be more confident." A conversation gets the specific story: board presentations where they freeze up, the promotion they missed, the team that doesn't respect them. Conversational intake scored 80.2 vs 61.9 on usability compared to static forms in peer-reviewed research.
The form
Ends here. You interpret the rest.
The conversation
Keeps asking until the answer is usable.
Static forms produce surface-level answers coaches must interpret. Conversational intake probes vague responses and captures the depth coaches need to start coaching immediately.